Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Patton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 3, 1993Published

1DissentPollock, Justice

I agree with the majority that N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10c violates defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination as guaranteed by the common law of this State and by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. I respectfully disagree, however, that engrafting use-and fruits-immunity on the statute is consistent with the legislative intent. Ante at 402, 627 A.2d at 1119. With one exception, I dissent substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 256 N.J.Super. 413, 607 A.2d 191 (1992). The exception is that I find the statute facially unconstitutional.

O…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Ran-Dav's County Kosher, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API