Legal Opinion

De Luxe Glass Co. v. Martin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1949No. 7281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Plaintiff as material supplier sued defendant Martin as general contractor, defendant Capson-Bowman, Inc., as owner of the land, and defendant General Casualty Company of America, as surety in the contractor’s performance bond, to recover the unpaid balance owing for certain materials purchased by defendant contractor in the construction of a store. The interveners were other materialmen who sought the same relief as plaintiff. From a judgment against the general contractor and against the surety, the latter only appeals.

The principal question raised by the appeal is the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Smith v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. M. H. Walker Realty Co. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Montgomery v. RiefUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lignell v. BergUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Utah State Building Board v. Walsh Plumbing CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Senor T's Restaurant v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API