Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1955No. 8115Published

1DissentWade, Justice

I am not prepared to agree that this bond does not meet the requirements of sections 14-2-1 and 14-2-2, Utah Code Annotated so as to relieve the owner from liability. I see no substantial distinction between this case and the DeLuxe Glass Co. v. Martin, 116 Utah 144, 208 P.2d 1127, in which we held that the bond met the requirements of those sections of the statute. In that case the bond did not expressly authorize the persons who furnished labor or material to bring suit on the bond. It did require the payment by the contractor-'of all of the-costs of construction of" the'building in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Luxe Glass Co. v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API