Legal Opinion
Division 1235, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. Metropolitan Transit Authority, Ate
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1981No. 79-1511PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
650 F.2d 1389
107 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2880
DIVISION 1235, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ATE Management and Service
Company and Transportation Management of
Tennessee, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 79-1511.
Sixth Circuit.
Argued June 5, 1980.
Decided June 3, 1981.
Charles H. Warfield, Ellen K. Bronaugh, Farris, Warfield & Kanady, Peter Curry, Metropolitan Dept. of Law, Legal Dept., Nashville, Tenn., for defendants-appellants.
Cecil D. Branstetter, Branstetter, Moody & Kilgore, Nashville, Tenn., Linda R. Hirschman, Jacobs, Burns, Sugarman & Orlove,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meltzer v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Local Division 519, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. Lacrosse Municipal Transit Utility and City of Lacrosse, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Division 1287, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Local Division 1285, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Jackson Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Division 1235, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Division 587, Amalgamated Transit Union, Afl-Cio, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Defendant-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981