Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Eggleston

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1983No. 13946PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

Appellee Vaughn filed a complaint against appellant Egglestons and others seeking an injunction and damages for alleged violations of restrictive real estate covenants. Appellant Egglestons answered and counterclaimed. A court trial ensued resulting in a judgment for a permanent and mandatory injunction against appellant Egglestons. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellee Vaughn developed the Alice Subdivision in the Black Hills between Deadwood and Sturgis, South Dakota. In 1975, appellee Vaughn sold appellant Eggle-stons Lot 9 in the Alice Subdivision subject to recorded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Matter of Estate of NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Thodos v. ShirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Piechowski v. CaseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Pool v. DenbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Selle v. PierceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Keil v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Matter of Estate of WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API