Legal Opinion

O'Connell & Co. v. Braidman

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 25, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtForte, J.

This is an action in contract for the plaintiff-broker’s recovery of a real estate commission for producing a ready, willing and able buyer whose failure to purchase the subject property was allegedly attributable to the defendant-seller’s misconduct.

The plaintiff has appealed the trial court’s allowance of the defendant’s Dist./Mun. Cts. R Civ. P., Rule 56 motion for summary judgment. The pleadings, affidavits, depositions and answers to interrogatories submitted by both parties indicate the following:

In November, 1987, the plaintiff drafted and both parties executed an exclusive brokerage…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  4. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reineke v. DiCostanzoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API