Reineke v. DiCostanzo
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, P.J.
This is an action for indemnification, pursuant to the parties’ agreement for the sale of corporate stock, to recover from defendant James DiCostanzo (“DiCos-tanzo”) the amount of a judgment obtained by the Boston Globe in a separate action *195against Johannes Reineke (“Reineke”), the plaintiff herein. DiCostanzo denied Reineke’s claim on the grounds that the parties’ purchase agreement restricted his indemnification obligations to two specifically enumerated debts which did not include the Boston Globe bill. The parties’ filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the court ruled in Reineke’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Offices Unlimited, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. City of HolyokeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Willitts v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.