Qualls v. State

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of abandonment after seduction and marriage.

Appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment on three grounds, the first being that the Jaw is unconstitutional. We discussed this question so thoroughly in the case of Thacker v. State, 62 Texas Crim. Rep., 294, we do not deem it necessary to discuss the question again, and hold that the court did not err in overruling the motion to quash on that ground. The second ground is that the indictment where it was intended to use the word “woman” only the letters “worn” appear. Appellant cites us to…