Legal Opinion
Bailey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 15, 1911No. 1374PublishedCited by 14 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
The following is the indictment in this case, to wit:
“In the name and by the authority of the State of Texas:
“The grand jurors, for the County of Comanche, State aforesaid, duly organized as such at the April term, A. D., 1911, of the District Court for said county, upon their oaths in said court, present that B. M. Bailey on or about the 17th day of August, A. D., One thousand nine hundred and ten, and anterior to the presentment of this indictment, in the county of Comanche and State of Texas, did then and there unlawfully, canally know, and incestuously have carnal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dement v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- State v. EarpTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- State v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Harden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Yeager v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Figueroa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.