Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vincente

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 5, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether, under Federal law, 1 a trial judge may revoke probation on the basis of statements suppressed at trial for failure to comply with Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 2 We conclude that there was no error in admitting Vincente’s inculpatory statements at the probation revocation hearing. We therefore affirm the order revoking probation.

Pablo Colon Vincente, while on probation for a drug possession offense, was arrested for trafficking in cocaine. Vincente was driving in a van with his sister, brother-in-law, and nieces and nephews at the time of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. JoubertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. SimonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. RaineyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API