Commonwealth v. Vincente
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The sole issue on appeal is whether, under Federal law, 1 a trial judge may revoke probation on the basis of statements suppressed at trial for failure to comply with Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 2 We conclude that there was no error in admitting Vincente’s inculpatory statements at the probation revocation hearing. We therefore affirm the order revoking probation.
Pablo Colon Vincente, while on probation for a drug possession offense, was arrested for trafficking in cocaine. Vincente was driving in a van with his sister, brother-in-law, and nieces and nephews at the time of his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. JoubertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. SimonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RaineyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.