Legal Opinion

Hull v. Detroit Equipment Installation, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1968No. Docket 2,866PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gtllis, J.

Defendant-lessee appeals the granting of a summary judgment to plaintiff-lessor. The litigation centered on the liability for the increased sewage charges occasioned by defendant’s use of the leased premises as a laundromat and dry cleaning establishment.

The trial court correctly held that the interpretation of the lease agreement was a question of law properly resolved on a motion for summary judgment. At a hearing on the motion brought pursuant to G-CB 1963,117.2(3) both parties asserted the lack of any material issue of fact on the lease agreement. In fact, defendant-lessee’s counsel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zamler v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Blake v. Metropolitan Chain StoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Wycoff v. Gavriloff Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Brown v. SchiappacasseMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hill v. London, Stetelman, & Kirkwood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. G & a INC v. NahraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Whinnen v. 231 CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. In re StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GraelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API