Hull v. Detroit Equipment Installation, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gtllis, J.
Defendant-lessee appeals the granting of a summary judgment to plaintiff-lessor. The litigation centered on the liability for the increased sewage charges occasioned by defendant’s use of the leased premises as a laundromat and dry cleaning establishment.
The trial court correctly held that the interpretation of the lease agreement was a question of law properly resolved on a motion for summary judgment. At a hearing on the motion brought pursuant to G-CB 1963,117.2(3) both parties asserted the lack of any material issue of fact on the lease agreement. In fact, defendant-lessee’s counsel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zamler v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Blake v. Metropolitan Chain StoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Wycoff v. Gavriloff Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Brown v. SchiappacasseMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hill v. London, Stetelman, & Kirkwood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- G & a INC v. NahraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Whinnen v. 231 CORP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- In re StewartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GraelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.