Legal Opinion
Brown v. Schiappacasse
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by William J. Brown against Louis Schiappacasse for rent. Prom a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
On February 28, 1889, one J. C. Mueller made, executed, and delivered to tbe defendant a written lease of certain premises in Detroit. The lease provides:
“The said party of the first part, in consideration of the rents and covenants herein specified, does hereby let or lease to the said party of the second part the following described premises, situate and being in the city of Detroit, Wayne county, State of Michigan, to wit: One-half of cellar in front of stairway leading down from G. Murray’s saloon in store 110 Woodward avenue, corner of Congress street. I consent to his occupying the side…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Wolverine Upholstery Company v. AmmermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Hull v. Detroit Equipment Installation, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Gregory v. Village of Lake LindenMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Baer v. MinockMichigan Supreme Court · 1901