Legal Opinion

Sayre & Fisher Land Co. v. R. U. Rue Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 14, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, V. C.

The complainants seek to restrain defendant from obstructing and interfering with their use of a certain roadway which they allege to be a public roadway, and in which, in any event, some of them allege they have individual easements.

Defendant admits the obstruction, but denies that complainants have any such rights. It has. filed its. answer wherein it challenges the jurisdiction of this court to determine the disputed question of title.

Of course, equity has. jurisdiction of a bill to restrain obstruction of complainants’ easement, but it lias been equally well settled that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fleet-Mcginley Co. v. BothwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oddo v. SaibinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Rockaway Rolling Mill Corp. v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Rockaway, C., Corp. v. D., L. W.R.R. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API