Legal Opinion

Doodan v. Szawlinsky

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1962No. Appeal, 95PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The plaintiff, a member of the bar of Philadelphia County, represented the defendant, Szawlinsky, in a trespass action which resulted in a verdict for Szawlinsky in the sum of $10,000. The garnishee had insured the defendant in the trespass action against liability in the sum of $5000. After the judgment in the trespass action had been affirmed by the Supreme Court, the garnishee issued its check to Szawlinsky and the plaintiff jointly in the sum of $5,348.35, the face amount of the policy, plus interest and costs.

The defendant, being dissatisfied because he was not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lancaster Bank v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perel v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Egnal v. Friedman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API