Legal Opinion

Asper v. Nelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2017No. 28006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, Justice

[1Í1J Two township residents petitioned the circuit court to issue a writ of mandamus compelling the township to repair and maintain two secondary roads. After two hearings, the circuit court denied the request to issue a writ because the court concluded that the township proved that it was unable to perform its mandatory duty to repair and maintain the two secondary roads. The residents appeal. We affirm.

Background

[¶2.] On November 19, 2015, Timothy Asper and Galazin Family, LLC petitioned the circuit court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering Raritan Township in Day County, South Dakota, to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Girard Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Anderson v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. Sioux Falls Traction SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Hooper v. HahnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Preserve French Creek v. Custer CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API