City of Sioux Falls v. Sioux Falls Traction System
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, P. J.
Defendant operates a street railway in the city of Sioux Falls. Its franchise 'depends on Ordinance No. 392 of said city. Section 7 of such ordinance provides that, whenever a street where tracks are laid is ordered paved, defendant shall pave at its own expense that portion of the street between the rails and one foot on outer side of each rail with the same material used for paving the remainder of the street, with brick toothing next to the rails. In July, 1923, the city council by resolution ordered a section of Van Eps street paved with Portland cement concrete paving. This section of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Illinois Central Railroad v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Potwin Place v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Moody v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. People ex rel. Attorney GeneralIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Forbes v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Johnson v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. Otter Tail Power CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Asper v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017