Legal Opinion

WildEarth Guardians v. Lamar Utilities Board

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 21, 2013No. Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-02974-DME-BNBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REVISED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR ABSTENTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge..

This matter comes before the Court on three pending motions. After considering those motions and relevant briefing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff Wildearth Guardians’ (“Wildearth’s”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 77), DENIES Wildearth’s Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Documents in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 78), and DENIES…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Illinois Power Resources, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Voigt v. Coyote Creek Mining Co.United States District Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API