WildEarth Guardians v. Lamar Utilities Board
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
REVISED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION FOR ABSTENTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. EBEL, Circuit Judge..
This matter comes before the Court on three pending motions. After considering those motions and relevant briefing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff Wildearth Guardians’ (“Wildearth’s”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 77), DENIES Wildearth’s Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Documents in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 78), and DENIES…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Illinois Power Resources, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
- Voigt v. Coyote Creek Mining Co.United States District Court · 2018