Legal Opinion
Bell v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 24, 1956No. 15701PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
. PER CURIAM.
Appellant Roy Bell sued Ollie Davis and husband, B. J. Davis, for partition of a tract of land, appellant alleging that he owned an undivided seven-eighths interest in the tract. Appellee Myrtle A. Bell intervened, claiming to be the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the land. Appellant moved for summary judgment against appellee Myrtle A. Bell, supporting his motion with affidavits. Myrtle A. Bell filed a reply to the motion for summary judgment, and filed an opposing affidavit. The court overruled the motion for summary judgment.
Appellees have moved to dismiss the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Morgenstern Chemical Co., Inc. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Jones v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Miers v. BrouseTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Atlantic Co. v. Citizens Ice & Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Tri-Continental Financial Corporation, A. C. Allyn and Company, Incorporated, American Transportation Enterprises, Inc., Equitable Securities Corporation, Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co., the Robinson-Humphrey Company, Inc., and John W. Clarke & Co., Helene Glenmore v. John I. AhernCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- A. A. A. Realty Co. v. NeeceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959