Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 2, 1959No. 109, Docket 25793; Docket 25879Published

1DissentClark, Circuit Judge

In this case a panel majority has held, against strong dissent by Judge WATERMAN, that a trial judge’s rejection of one theory of liability, leaving others pending, is the denial of an injunction sufficient to support an appeal and reversal for issuance of the injunction. Glenmore v. Ahern, 2 Cir., 276 F.2d 537. Since this raises questions of the most serious nature, I asked all my brothers, as soon as I learned of the ruling, to consider it further in banc. While the vote was divided, it was against such consideration here. The matter is of such importance in our daily practice that it seems…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API