Saunders v. Fredette
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
The record presents the question of the competency and sufficiency of the evidence received in proof of the plaintiff’s illegitimacy.
Under the older common law, every child born of a married woman was presumed to be legitimate, unless the husband was impotent or had been beyond the “four seas” during the possible period of gestation. 5 Wig., Ev. 2527. This presumption was conclusive and evidence to the contrary was inadmissible. Ib; 33 Harv. Law Rev. 306. This adamant rule early gave way to a more liberal doctrine which permitted other proof of the want of access of the husband to the mother…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Orthwein v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Patterson v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Watts v. WattsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Bodwell v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- In Re Estate of JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Craven v. SelwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.