Legal Opinion

Austin Shoe Stores v. Elizabeth Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1976No. 5542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff-Appellant Austin Shoe Stores, Inc., brought this suit against Defendant-Appellees The Elizabeth Company, Inc., Ridgway Management Corporation and I. Boyd Ridgway for reimbursement of rents in the amount of $3089.48 plus reasonable attorneys’ fees. All parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of all three Defendants that Plaintiff take nothing, from which Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff’s pleadings allege in effect substantially the following: That…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kingsbery v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. J. H. Milliken & Co. v. Callahan CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. ElkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boy Scouts of America v. Responsive Terminal Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Weinacht v. Phillips Coal Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. Okon v. MBank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  4. Stewart v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Gar-Dal, Inc. v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API