Legal Opinion

Mebane v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2012No. S-11-0196PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDERSON, District Judge.

[¶ 1] The Appellant, Chad Faron Mebane, appeals from his convictions of possession of methamphetamine, a misdemeanor, and two counts of delivery of methamphetamine. Mebane asserts that the trial court erred by failing to advise him before he testified that he had a right not to testify and, as a result, his choice to testify was not made intelligently. We find that Mebane was adequately advised by the trial court at arraignment of his right to remain silent and hold that he voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to remain silent. According ly, we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. MozeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Archie D. Wright v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. LaVigne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lobatos v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Starrett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Jackson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Chad Faron Mebane v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Sadler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Cody Russell Nelson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API