Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Wilhite

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1930No. 7061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In the general grounds of the motion for a new trial the movant asked that the verdict be set aside as contrary to law and contrary to the evidence; and we are of the opinion that upon these grounds *797the motion should not have been overruled. It is plain from the evidence that F. M. Bailey was dead at the time of the trial, and had been dead for a considerable time. In addition to the fact that the record discloses that no representative of this deceased party had been appointed, it appears in the bill of exceptions and is conceded by both counsel that this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. TomberlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Biggs v. SilveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Ellis v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  4. Paulk v. Ensign-Oskamp Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Kehoe v. RourkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Bryan v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  3. Edwards v. SosebeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API