Legal Opinion

L. Teplitz Thrown Silk Co. v. Rich

Passaic County Circuit Court, N.J.

Decided June 17, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Poetek, C. C. J.

By stipulation of counsel the question raised in this case is submitted to the court for decision. It appears that the deceased, Garret Van Nimwegen, guaranteed in writing the payment to the plaintiff of certain obligations of Rich. The guarantor died April 30th, 1934. The executrix of his estate published in a newspaper a notice to bar creditors on June 15th, 1934. Actual notice of his death did not come to the knowledge of plaintiff until early in July, 1934. Between the date of death and before knowledge by plaintiff of that fact, to wit, June 7th, 8th, 12th and 19th, 1934,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fisher, Brown & Co. v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Bedford v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Gay v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  4. Lorch's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Hyland v. HabichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First New Jersey Bank v. FLM Bus. MacHines, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. American Oil Co. v. Estate of WigleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chain v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  4. Swift & Co. v. SmigelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Chain v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API