Legal Opinion

Bethlehem v. Druckenmiller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1942No. Appeal, 63PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer,

The City of Bethlehem filed this bill in equity against defendants, husband and wife, owners of a property in the city, as tenants by the entireties, on which the husband conducts a stone cutting and monumental business. The property is located in a thickly populated residential district within two blocks of the City Hall. The bill alleged that the business as conducted is a public and private nuisance. The prayer was for an injunction forbidding and abating its continuance.

The chancellor, with ample testimony to support him, found that electrical power…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perrin's App. Bd. of Adjustment's App.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Evans v. Reading Chemical Fertilizing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Heinl v. PecherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Thomas v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Baker Et. Ux. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKees Rocks Borough v. Rennekamp Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Commonwealth v. Glen Alden Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. Glen Alden Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Crew v. Gallagher, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API