Goldfinger v. Feintuch
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This case concerns the legality of the conduct of the defendant union which the plaintiff claims constitutes an unlawful secondary boycott.
For some years the plaintiff has operated a retail delicatessen store on the lower east side of Manhattan. In addition to kosher delicatessen provisions he sells other foodstuffs and conducts a luncheonette business. One of the brands of kosher provisions he sells is Ukor, a non-union made product manufactured by a copartnership consisting of Walter and Irving Blumenthal. The Blumenthals operate the only non-union plant in the city of New York…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bossert v. . DhuyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Reno v. Second Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- Riggs v. Tucker Duck & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Weil & Co. v. "John Doe"New York Supreme Court · 1938