Legal Opinion

State v. Raynor

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 8, 2018No. AC41018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEveleigh, J.

The defendant, Donald Raynor, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a(a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied the defendant's motion in limine to exclude or limit the scope of the testimony of the state's expert witness on firearm and toolmark identification, and (2) abused its discretion by granting the state's motion for uncharged misconduct related to a shooting that occurred approximately eight months after the events of this case. We disagree and, accordingly,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  3. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. State v. RaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API