Legal Opinion

United States v. Mikel Bolander

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 5, 2013No. 12-6146PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KEENAN joined.

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge:

The government certified Mikel Bolander as a “sexually dangerous person” under the Adam Walsh Act, 18 U.S.C. § 4248 (the Act). In the ensuing civil commitment proceeding, the district court found that the government had proven by clear and convincing evidence that Bolander is a sexually dangerous person under the Act. As a result, he was committed to the custody of the Attorney General of the United States. On appeal, Bolander challenges this ruling,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Eramo v. Rolling Stone LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
  2. Chevron Corporation v. Aaron PageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Byron AntoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Jose De La Luz PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Juan LaraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API