Legal Opinion

Warner v. Lieberman

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 17, 1957No. 56-C-237PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.Rules Civ.Proc, rule 56, 28 U.S.C.A., based upon the records, files, depositions and affidavit of the defendant Eleanor Lieberman. There have been filed in opposition to the motion, an affidavit of the plaintiff and an affidavit of Aaron Starobin, one of her attorneys.

On this motion only the facts most favorable to the plaintiff and the most permissible inférentíes from-those-facts need be considered. The court is not authorized to determine issues of fact or permissible…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Cleary v. EckartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Greenfield v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Potter Title and Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WeltyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Davis v. Henderlong Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1963
  3. Jack v. FillmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Cupp v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Prince v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API