Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 8, 2003No. 51323-1-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

After After Jesse R. Smith’s participation in drug court was terminated and his deferred prosecution revoked, he was convicted of delivery of cocaine. The trial court declined to grant Smith a Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA) sentence, stating, “I am not of a mind to give DOSAs [to people who do not make it through drug court].” Smith characterizes this statement as a refusal by the trial court to exercise its discretion, which in and of itself constitutes an abuse of discretion. We characterize it as a tenable basis for the court’s exercise of discretion not to grant a DOSA. But…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. GronnertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In Re JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API