Legal Opinion

United States v. Quoc Viet Hoang

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2007No. 05-10669PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge.

Quoe Viet Hoang entered a conditional guilty plea to federal narcotics charges after methamphetamine was found in a package sent to him via FedEx. A narcotics detection dog alerted to the package while it was in transit, and it was then diverted while a search warrant was obtained. The search revealed the presence of drugs, and a controlled delivery to Hoang resulted in his arrest. Before entering his plea, Hoang moved to suppress evidence of the methamphetamine, asserting that the detention and search of the package violated the Fourth Amendment. He contends that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. John McTiernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. LozanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. State of Minnesota v. Corey Joel EichersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API