Legal Opinion
United States v. Lozano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 2010No. 09-30151PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
OPINION
2Per curiam
We must decide, among other issues, whether the admission of marijuana evidence, found in a mailed package delayed twenty-two hours in delivery due to the remoteness of the site from canine investigation, violates the Fourth Amendment.
I
A
1
In the spring of 2007, Robert Lozano, Sr., shared a residence in Barrow, Alaska, with his son, who was on state probation. Based on suspicion that Lozano’s son had violated the terms of his probation, state officers conducted a search of the son’s room and of the common areas of Lozano’s home, and…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Van LeeuwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Hector Ramirez-JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Sarah CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Ramiro Plascencia-OrozcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jose Jimenez-ChaidezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Procknow v. CurryDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- United States v. Seraphina CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.