Legal Opinion
Proal v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 18, 2017No. 16-2150UUnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Stage-Setting
A district judge dismissed Carol Proal’s state-law complaint against J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“J.P. Morgan”) and Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) for failure to state a claim. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). And Proal appeals. Because the parties know the facts, a simple sketch of the complaint’s well-pleaded allegations—taken as true, Schatz v. Republican State Leadership Comm., 669 F.3d 50, 55 (1st Cir. 2012)—suffices for present purposes.
In March 2007, Proal bought a home in Massachusetts, borrowing $528,000 from Community Lending Incorporated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Schatz v. Republican State Leadership CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.United States District Court · 2018
- McGillen v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N ADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020