Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Duke Power Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1994No. 9310UC278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

On the appeals of respondent Haywood EMC and intervenors NCEMC and the Public Staff, the questions presented are whether the Commission erred in: (1) failing to render its decision pursuant to the standards set forth in G.S. 62-79(a), thereby frustrating appellate review; (2) reassigning complainant M-B Industries, the manufacturing company, from Haywood EMC to Duke; (3) failing to reassign the residential complainants to an electric supplier other than Haywood EMC, and; (4) excluding an expert’s testimony regarding the adverse economic impact on Haywood EMC of shifting…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Holt v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API