Dennis v. Duke Power Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
On the appeals of respondent Haywood EMC and intervenors NCEMC and the Public Staff, the questions presented are whether the Commission erred in: (1) failing to render its decision pursuant to the standards set forth in G.S. 62-79(a), thereby frustrating appellate review; (2) reassigning complainant M-B Industries, the manufacturing company, from Haywood EMC to Duke; (3) failing to reassign the residential complainants to an electric supplier other than Haywood EMC, and; (4) excluding an expert’s testimony regarding the adverse economic impact on Haywood EMC of shifting…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dennis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Holt v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997