Roy v. Clarke
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Hays. Tried below before Hon. H. Teichmueller. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HOBBY, Judge.
The first error assigned relates to the action of the court in overruling the exceptions to the plaintiff’s first amended and first supplemental petition. The substance of these exceptions was, that as it .appeared from the face of the petition that the last purchase money note was in the hands of Roy, the defendant, and there was no" offer to pay the same, there could be no recovery. The suit was for the recovery of the possession of the laud which appellee had purchased from Roy, and which possession Roy had contracted to deliver by the 1st of November, 1884, a date prior to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clements v. LacyTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Stone v. DarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Farmer v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Morphy v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by19 opinions
- Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. BeckleyTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Hamblet v. Coveney, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Floyd v. HammondTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Prout v. BurkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.