Legal Opinion
Oberndorf v. City & County of Denver
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1990No. Nos. 88-2599, 88-2928PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants appeal a summary judgment order which dismissed with prejudice all of their antitrust and civil rights claims against the defendants. We conclude that the district court properly found that there was no genuine issue of material fact in dispute. Because that court correctly applied the substantive law, we affirm.
I
This ease arises from the proposed Cen-terstone redevelopment project in downtown Denver. The plaintiffs-appellants, the Oberndorf family and Block 173 Associates (landowners), opposed the project which would have been constructed in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. American Fundware, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Classic Communications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Oberndorf v. City And County Of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Buckley Construction, Inc. v. Shawnee Civic & Cultural Development AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.