Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Cunningham v. Fetters

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1930Published

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

There is danger that the final disposition of this cause may be delayed and its merits lost in a maze of procedural questions. A recapitulation may make clear the present record situation. The main question to be determined in this cause had been fully discussed in the closely akin case of U. S. v. Barry (D. C.) 25 F.(2d) 733.

The view taken of the first case had made the disposition of the second by this court almost perfunctory. To expedite a ruling, it was arranged that a warrant be applied for and issued and hearing given the defendant by a judge of this court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Cunningham v. BarryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. United States ex rel. Cunningham v. MathuesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  3. United States ex rel. Cunningham v. MathuesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API