Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Cunningham v. Barry

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1928No. 131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

We were asked to allow this writ to be made returnable forthwith, hut to continue the hearing to April 5, 1928, in order that the questions raised might he argued by counsel. This was accordingly done. At the conclusion of the argument at bar, we were asked to withhold a ruling, with leave to submit written briefs. This leave was granted, but, as the cause should be decided promptly, leave was further given either party to ask for a ruling at any time, whether the briefs had been filed or not. The cause is now ripe for a ruling.

We were further asked to notify counsel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Bunker v. McCormickDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  3. People v. McDonaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. United States ex rel. Cunningham v. FettersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API