Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served On Meserve
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1995No. 94-56125PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
62 F.3d 1222
32 Fed.R.Serv.3d 846, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6323,
95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,788
In re GRAND JURY SUBPOENA SERVED ON MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JANET GREESON'S A PLACE FOR US, INC.; Janet Greeson; Janet
Greeson's A Place For Us of Van Nuys, Inc.; Janet Greeson's
A Place For Us at Costa Mesa, Inc.; and Janet Greeson's A
Place For Us at Long Beach, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants.
No. 94-56125.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 5, 1995.
Decided Aug. 10, 1995.
As Amended Sept. 6, 1995.
Stephen Acker and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pillsbury Co. v. ConboySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martindell v. International Telephone And Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- King v. Olympic Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- In Re: Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Steiner v. Minnesota Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Ruszczyk v. NoorDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.