Legal Opinion
In Re: Grand Jury
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 5, 2002No. 01-4042PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to resolve the conflict that arises when a grand jury subpoena seeks production of evidence ostensibly shielded by a civil protective order. Appellant is a target of a grand jury investi gation in the District of New Jersey. The Government seeks to obtain, by way of a grand jury subpoena, testimony, documents, and other discovery material given pursuant to a protective order in a pending civil case. Appellant filed a motion to quash the subpoena on the ground that the protective order barred disclosure of the documents to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Steiner v. Minnesota Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- In Re Suprema Specialities, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- In re the Grand Jury Empaneled on May 9, 2014Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Fanelli v. Centenary CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.