Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Park Miller LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 11, 2020No. 3:20-cv-06818Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KEVIN HAGAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06818-CRB 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 11 PARK MILLER LLC, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Kevin and Laura Hagan have moved to compel Park Miller LLC, John Miller, and 14 Stuart Park to arbitrate the Hagans’ claims against them. The Court grants the Hagans’ 15 motion as to Park Miller and denies their motion as to Mr. Miller and Mr. Park. The Court 16 also holds that the Hagans will be entitled to reasonable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Burns v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Michelle Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API