Legal Opinion
Derminer v. Kramer
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 8, 2005No. CIV. 04-74942PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, the heirs of Robert Derminer (also called Rob Tyner) of the Detroit band the “MC5”, move for a preliminary injunction. Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued a report and recommendation recommending I deny this motion in its entirety. Plaintiffs make nine objections to this report and recommendation.
For the reasons explained below, I find that jurisdiction has been called into question, 1 and thus, it is not yet appropriate for me to either adopt or reject the magistrate’s recommendation as to the motion. However, as discussed below, I do adopt…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Derminer v. KramerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Rattray v. Woodbury County, IowaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012
- Hawaiian Village Computer, Inc. v. Print Management Partners, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Pure Country Weavers, Inc. v. Bristar, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Reed v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.