Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chambers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 2017No. Com. v. Chambers, R. No. 2389 EDA 2015PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SOLANO, J.:

Appellant, Richard A. Chambers, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed by the trial court after it convicted him at a bench trial of aggravated assault, conspiracy, possession of an instrument of crime (PIC), terroristic threats, simple assault, and recklessly endangering another person. 1 Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions, and specifically contends that the trial court erred in its characterization of mace as a deadly weapon. Upon review, we affirm.

Appellant’s convictions arose from a physical altercation with Mr.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. RhoadesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. SullivanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Bollard & Assoc. v. H&R IndustriesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Bingham, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Bishop, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Brown, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API