Legal Opinion

Young v. Hunderup

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1989No. 3-88-015-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANNON, Chief Justice.

Appellee Robert 0. Hunderup sued appellant Grace Young, a real estate broker, in the district court of Travis County, for claimed violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Appellee pleaded that appellant solicited him to purchase a two-acre tract of land in Austin. Appellee averred further that appellant misrepresented to him that the tract was zoned “light industrial.” Acting upon the misrepresentation, appellee purchased the land, to his claimed damage. The district court rendered a post-answer default judgment for damages against appellant.

Appellee challenges…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hoover v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. First Dallas Petroleum, Inc. v. Hawkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Gumpp v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dwight G. Harden v. James A. Collins Wayne Scott, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division And Melinda Bozarth, Director of Paroles Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  2. Garza, Ricardo v. Crecelius, Phil, Rene R. Barrientos and Rene R. Barrientos, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  3. Marshall Jackson, Jr. v. W. J. Estelle, Jr. and State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API