Legal Opinion

Matter of Katz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 30, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arose from a motion filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB), seeking final discipline of respondent, Steven L. Katz, pursuant to Rule l:20-6(b)(2)(i). The motion was based on respondent's plea of guilty to the misdemeanor of promoting prostitution in the fourth degree under § 230.20 of the New York Penal Law. The DRB found that respondent has engaged in illegal conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law and has recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for two years. Our…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of GoldbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. In Re MischlichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Matter of TusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LyzengaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. SUP. CT. BD. OF PROF'L ETHICS v. LyzengaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API