National Labor Relations Board v. Ellis and Watts Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
The case is before us on petition for enforcement of the Board’s order. The Board found that respondent employer had interfered with, restrained and coerced employees in their right to engage in concerted activity; that it laid off 27 of 43 production employees in order to discourage membership in the union and refused to bargain collectively with the union all in violation of Sections 8(a) (1), 8(a) (3) (1), and 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.
The principal contention urged upon us by respondent is that the layoffs were made on account of economic…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Putnam Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Nierotko v. Social Security BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Challenge-Cook Brothers of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ellis and Watts Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Virgin Islands Labor Union v. Caribe Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Superex Drugs, Inc. And Superex Drugs of Kentucky, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 369 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, and George F. Wode, Its AgentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.