Legal Opinion
D & N Bank v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 17, 2003No. Nos. 02-5130, 02-5144PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Before the United States Court of Federal Claims, D & N Bank (“D & N”) sought damages in a breach of contract action that it argued arose from the 1989 enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”), Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (1989). D & N now appeals the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims granting the government’s motion for summary judgment of no contract liability. D & N Bank v. United States, No. 95-539(C) (Fed.Cl.2002) (order memorializing hearing on dispositive motions and resolving merits of count…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Winstar Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- First Commerce Corporation, and Fdic, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and First Commerce Savings Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- La Van v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.