Legal Opinion

Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1936No. 3815Published

1Opinion of the Court

80 F.2d 912 (1935)

HOELTKE

v.

C. M. KEMP MFG. CO.

No. 3815.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 18, 1935.

On Rehearing January 10, 1936.

Frank Keiper, of Rochester, N. Y. (Robert R. Carman, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.

Arlon V. Cushman, of Washington, D. C., and Lewis W. Lake, of Baltimore, Md. (Cushman, Darby & Cushman, William M. Cushman, and C. Willard Hayes, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER and SOPER, Circuit Judges, and HAYES, District Judge.

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit instituted to enjoin infringement of patent No.…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API