Legal Opinion
Baker v. Motorists Insurance Companies
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBSON, Justice.
Appellant, Nicholas Baker, is an attorney who asserts that he is entitled to a statutory fee from Motorist Insurance Companies (“Motorist”) under KRS 304.39-070(5), a part of the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act (MVRA). It provides:
“An attorney representing a secured person in any action filed under KRS 304.-39-060 shall be entitled to a reasonable attorneys’ fee in the event that reparation benefits paid to said secured person by that secured person’s reparation’s obligor are reimbursed by any insurance carrier on behalf of a tortfeasor who is the defendant in any such action…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1982
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
- MFA Insurance Co. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
- Morris v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- A.M. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
- John Byrnes v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
- John Byrnes v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
- John Byrnes v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
- John Byrnes v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.