Legal Opinion

Baker v. Motorists Insurance Companies

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBSON, Justice.

Appellant, Nicholas Baker, is an attorney who asserts that he is entitled to a statutory fee from Motorist Insurance Companies (“Motorist”) under KRS 304.39-070(5), a part of the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act (MVRA). It provides:

“An attorney representing a secured person in any action filed under KRS 304.-39-060 shall be entitled to a reasonable attorneys’ fee in the event that reparation benefits paid to said secured person by that secured person’s reparation’s obligor are reimbursed by any insurance carrier on behalf of a tortfeasor who is the defendant in any such action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  4. MFA Insurance Co. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
  5. Morris v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. A.M. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  2. John Byrnes v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
  3. John Byrnes v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  4. John Byrnes v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  5. John Byrnes v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API