Legal Opinion

State v. Kent

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 12, 1964No. 50687PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYDE, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, charged under the Habitual Criminal Statute (Sec. 556.280), was found guilty of possession of a narcotic drug and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. Secs. 195.020 and 195.200 (statutory references are to RSMo and V.A.M.S.); State v. Kent, Mo.Sup., 375 S.W.2d 40. However, while a prior conviction of defendant was shown, there was no evidence offered to show that, after sentence in the prior case, defendant was “subsequently placed on probation, paroled, fined or imprisoned therefor” as required by Sec. 556.280 to make the Habitual Criminal Statute…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. State v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Rossomanno v. Laclede Cab CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. State v. LindnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. State v. StonerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API